North India Statesman
[ad_1]
News India Live, Digital Desk: Just before the IPL 2026 season (which is scheduled to start from March 28), BCCI has won a major legal battle. The Kerala High Court has dismissed as “without any basis” the petition which claimed that the BCCI, being a private body, cannot use the word ‘Indian’ for its tournament.
What were the allegations of the petitioner?
A social worker from Ernakulam Ashique Karoth The following arguments were made in this petition filed by:
Private vs National: The petitioner said that BCCI is not a ‘National Sports Federation’ (NSF), but a private organization. Therefore calling the tournament organized by it as ‘Indian’ Premier League is misleading.
Violation of the Symbols and Names Act: It was alleged that the use of the word ‘Indian’ violates the ‘Emblems and Names (Prevention of Improper Use) Act, 1950’ as it gives a false impression of government patronage.
Late realization: The petition said that he recently realized that IPL is not an official government national tournament.
High Court’s harsh comment: “Why after 18 years?”
Chief Justice Soumen Sen and justice Shyam Kumar V.M. The division bench took a tough stance while hearing this petition:
Irrational Claim: The court said that there is no merit in this argument.
Why so much delay?: The bench questioned that if the IPL has been running successfully for the last 18 years, then why did the petitioner suddenly find it “illegal” after so many years?
Misuse of PIL: The court rejected the petition considering it a waste of judicial time.
Why was this victory important for BCCI?
If the court had banned this name, it could have created huge problems for BCCI:
Branding and Logistics: Only a few days are left for the tournament to start. Changing the name would have meant changing advertising, logos and merchandise worth crores overnight.
Broadcasting Rights: ‘Indian Premier League’ is a global brand. Any change in the name could lead to legal trouble over international broadcasting agreements.
