If the wife living with her husband is related to others, the child is born to the husband: Supreme Court

Supreme Court News: The Supreme Court gave the final verdict in a case that has been going on for the last two decades. The case was amidst the right to privacy of the person who did not want a DNA test and had the right to know the right to the son seeking alimony and who his biological father is. The Supreme Court finally rejected the demand of the son keeping in mind the right to privacy. The Supreme Court has ruled keeping in mind the three issues, the rights of women and the rights of sons.

The woman was married in 1989, she had a baby girl in 1991, followed by a child in 2001. The woman separated from her husband in 2003, later divorced in 2006. Meanwhile, the woman applied to the Municipal Corporation demanding changing the name of her child -born father -born father and claimed that her real father is another man. However, the municipality rejected the application. Later an appeal was made in the local court, the court ordered a DNA test of the biological father, which was challenged by the biological father in the High Court.

The High Court refused the DNA test, retaining the right to privacy. Also said that the order of paternity testing can be given only when it is proved that there was no contact between the husband and wife. Therefore, the decision of the High Court was later challenged by the son in the Supreme Court. However, the Supreme Court also upheld the High Court’s decision. In the Supreme Court, the young man argued that DNA test is necessary to know who his biological father is, it is my right. However, the person who was asked to conduct a DNA test opposed the son’s demand and claimed that the DNA test would violate my privacy.

The Supreme Court said that when the son was born, the woman was living with her husband in the same house, during this time, even if a child was born with another man, it should not be assumed that any relationship between the two Was not Woman and her husband. Even if we assume that the woman was in an extramarital affair and the child was born, this argument is not complete. One or more contacts do not prove that the woman had no relation with her husband. Therefore, the young man should be considered the son of his legitimate father. In this case, the Supreme Court gave this decision keeping in mind the woman’s credibility, the right to privacy of not conducting DNA tests, etc.