[ad_1]
New Delhi: The news of the acid attack on a DU student in Delhi, which had filled people’s hearts with anger and sympathy, turned out to be a deep and nefarious conspiracy hatched out of revenge. There is a shocking revelation in this story, which has shocked everyone. According to Delhi Police, there was no acid attack on the student, rather she had staged this entire drama at the behest of her own father.
The mastermind of this conspiracy is none other than the girl’s own father Akil Khan, who was arrested by the police on Monday.
Whole drama created with bathroom cleaner
The truth that has come out during the police interrogation is no less than the script of a crime thriller film. The father has confessed that his daughter herself had poured toilet cleaner on her hands, to make it look like someone had thrown acid on her.
Let us remind you that the student had initially accused three people – Jitendra, Ishaan and Armaan – of attacking her near Lakshmibai College in Delhi. But this entire story turned out to be fundamentally false.
Why was this disgusting conspiracy hatched?
Now the question arises that why would a father create such a big conspiracy by making his own daughter a pawn? The reason for this is even more shameful.
In fact, the wife of the man named Jitendra, whom the girl had accused of throwing acid, had filed a complaint of rape and sexual exploitation against the girl’s father Akil Khan three days ago.
The victim woman had told in her complaint that she used to work in the socks making factory of Akil Khan between 2021 and 2024. During this time, Akil forced himself on her and also kept blackmailing her by making her personal photos and videos.
When Jitendra’s wife gathered courage and lodged a complaint with the police, to avoid this case and take revenge, Akil Khan decided to implicate Jitendra in a false case and along with his daughter, created this acid attack drama.
How was this lie exposed?
When the police started investigating this matter in depth, all the lies were exposed one by one:
- Jitendra’s location: Technical investigation by the police made it clear that Jitendra was not there at the time of the attack, rather he was working in a house in Karol Bagh.
- No CCTV evidence: Even after scanning the CCTV footage of the place where the attack was reported and the surrounding roads, the police did not find any suspicious person.
- Truth about the remaining two accused: When the police traced Ishaan and Armaan, it was found that they were brothers and distant relatives of the student. He is having a land dispute with the student’s family, but he had nothing to do with Jitendra.
This entire case has shown how a man not only tried to cheat the law to cover up his crimes, but also used his own daughter in such a disgusting game.
North India Statesman